The European Commission's Multi-stakeholder Forum on eInvoicing unanimously approved a Recommendation calling for the Universal Business Language (UBL) Invoice to be considered in the European Standard on core invoice semantic. The Recommendation names OASIS as one of the "international organisations working on data models that cover the requirements of different industries and sectors; they are recognized and accepted globally and their standards are adopted by many actors within both the private and public sector".
Welcome to UBL.XML.org.
This is the official community gathering place and information resource for the OASIS UBL (ISO/IEC 19845) International Standard. UBL defines a royalty-free library of standard electronic XML business documents such as purchase orders and invoices.
This is a community-driven site, and the public is encouraged to contribute content. Find the appropriate area to contribute to by hovering your pointer over the site area titles listed in orange banner above. This will briefly reveal the area description in a small pop-up box. For more detail, please see our policies and descriptions regarding posting content to certain areas.
In order to receive email notifications of posts to this site, please click top-right on your username next to "Logged in as:", or bottom-right "My account", in order to get to your account page. Go to the "Subscriptions" tab and you'll see 5 different sub-areas. The "categories" and "content types" sub-areas have a number of check-boxes. Click on any or all and then save your selection in order to receive an email notification of a new post in that area of this web site.
How to extend UBL Order Object for specific to application
Hi,
i've requirment to add one more status in Order Document.
How to add user defined elements to existing Order Document (2.1)?
Thanks
Krish
European Commission Recommendation includes UBL
UBL 2.1 OASIS Standard supported by OASIS membership
The OASIS membership ballot for UBL 2.1 OASIS Standard has satisfied the minimum 15% approval with no negative votes:
Yes 77 100%
No 0 0%
Eligible companies who have voted: 77 of 306 25%
Eligible companies who have abstained: 0 of 306 0%
Eligible companies who have not voted: 229 of 306 75%
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=2527
Vote begins on UBL 2.1 as an OASIS Standard
Date: 2013-10-22
Five years of development to extend the OASIS Universal Business Language wrap up this month in a vote among the OASIS member organizations to approve the latest revision, UBL 2.1, as an OASIS Standard.
SUMMARY
UBL 2.1 entering membership vote phase
The OASIS UBL 2.1 Candidate OASIS Standard public review ended October 15, 2013 with no comments requesting changes or describing errors. This is a tremendous achievement and is evidence of no-one finding technical faults in the work product. Over five public reviews the issues discovered were addressed and the end result is shown to be acceptable.
This qualifies the specification to progress to the next phase of OASIS membership voting on OASIS UBL 2.1 becoming an OASIS Standard.
A commentary in three parts on the draft EU directive on e-invoicing
Mr. Mikkel Heppe Brun, VP of Global Strategy for Tradeshift, has created a three-part review of the draft EU directive on e-invoicing: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/e-procurement/e-in...
These make for interesting reading:
http://blog.tradeshift.com/failing-to-deliver-the-draft-eu-directive-on-...
http://blog.tradeshift.com/failing-to-deliver-part-2-the-draft-e-invoici...
http://blog.tradeshift.com/failing-deliver-part-3-ideal-e-invoicing-dire...
UN/CEFACT 22nd Forum
Use of GS1 GLN in CustomerParty
Dear all,
How can we indicate in CustomerParty that the IDs are Global Location numbers (EAN code) ?
We can see the CustomerAssignedAccountID, the SupplierAssignedAccountID and AdditionalAccountID but there is no way to indicate which scheme is used for the coding of these IDs.
Now I also looked at the UN/CEFACT and the CEN/BII specs. In the CEN/BII Core Data Model of the basic order these 3 IDs are even not used instead only the PartyIdentification is used.
AllowanceCharge on InvoiceLine
Hi,
I have case where an AllowanceCharge is calculated on InvoiceLine level. As I found in the UBL documentation, the LineExtensionAmount must include any discounts or surcharges.
So, in my case, LineExtensionAmount = PriceAmount - AllowanceCharge discount + AllowanceCharge surcharge.
However, when I try to validate the generated XML file on OIOUBL's website, I get an error stating the PriceAmount should be the same as the LineExtensionAmount.
I'm not sure what's wrong here. Here is an extract of the XML-file:
UBL 2.1 Candidate OASIS Standard 60-day Public Review ends October 15, 2013
OASIS has announced the 60-day public review starting today, August 15, 2013, ending Tuesday, October 15, 2013:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201308/msg00000.html
Comments may be submitted to the TC by any person through the use of the OASIS TC Comment Facility as explained in the instructions located via the button labeled "Send A Comment" at the top of the TC public home page, or directly at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=ubl